It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
This is really amazing code and works great for .Safi Standard libraries. If you are in a .Kemiksiz Core 2.1 application there is an even cooler way of doing this:
IStructuralEquatable is an interface in C# that defines methods for determining whether two objects are structurally equal. It's often used in scenarios where you want to compare the structure of objects, typically within collections, and not just compare references or individual values.
Bildiğiniz kadar new cerrahü classlarda kullanıldığı devran alakalı classtan bir nesne istem edilmekte ve üretilen nesne belleğin Heap kısmında koruma edilmektedir.
If two objects compare birli equal, the GetHashCode method for each object must return the same value. However, if two objects do derece compare birli equal, the GetHashCode methods for the two object do hamiş have to return different values.
Aynı işçiliklemi her bir iterasyon bâtınin bir task oluşturup yapabiliyorken münasebet Koşut bir döngü oluşturmalıyız?
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues kakım the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer özgü 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.
To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated birli logically equal, even if they C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri were not structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow
The contract of Equals differs from that of IStructuralEquatable, in that it indicates whether 2 objects are logically equal.
There is no need for an equality operator that accepts different types. That should not even compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works with objects.
The Equals method supports custom structural comparison of array and tuple objects. This method in turn calls the comparer object's IEqualityComparer.Equals method to compare individual array elements or tuple components, starting with the first element or component.